“First
Use of GFP for In Vivo Imaging”
Remembrances
of Takashi Chishima at AntiCancer, Inc., 1995-1997
The Night of the
Nobel Prize Announcement
It
was October 8, 2008. I had my outpatient
clinic and had many surgical cases as well and a staff meeting too. After I finally arrived home, my wife told me
“Hi darling! I heard that GFP won the Nobel Prize.” My memory flashed back to the US more than 12
years ago as if I had seen a revolving lantern.
Four Japanese scientists won the Nobel Prize in 2008. The Japanese got
excited over this good news which contrasted with gloomy stories such as
abnormal weather, recession, stock market crash, etc.
To
me, a Nobel Laureate is a great person.
Even though he was born in Japan, I did not know Dr. Shimomura but I was
impressed when I found out some years ago that he was the discoverer of GFP.
It
was more than 12 years ago when I was a student at the Graduate School of
Medical Sciences of Yokohama City Medical University. At that time, I went to the US as a post-doc
to study with Professor Robert M. Hoffman at AntiCancer, Inc., and the
Department of Surgery, UCSD. I came to
replace my senior colleague Shinji Togo, who would come back to our Medical
School. At AntiCancer, I studied the
process how cancer cells spread in live mice using GFP-expressing cancer cells,
the first use of GFP for in vivo imaging. Experiments that start from a small idea can have
a big influence on subsequent cancer research.
The Nobel Prize announcement noted the work I started as the prime use
of GFP. I still clearly remember what my
boss, Prof. Hoffman, said when I showed him my results: “Takashi!
This is a big discovery that happens once in 10 years.” This was in the summer of 1996.
Encounter with
GFP
In
the spring of 1995, I was unexpectedly invited to replace Dr. Togo at AntiCancer
and UCSD, which is a sister-University of Yokohama Medical University, as a post-doc
without much prior notice. These
arrangements were due to the close friendship of my Chairman, Professor Hiroshi
Shimada, and Professor A.R. Moossa, Chairman, Department of Surgery, UCSD. In the beginning, I was not very interested to
study abroad; however, I thought that studying abroad might become a good
chance to break the deadlock in my career which I was facing. After I accepted the offer, everything
proceeded very fast in a very short time and all arrangements were completed
within one month.
My
new life in the US had a great impact on me.
In addition to language problems, culture and customs and the way of
thinking differed from Japan. For the
first week after I arrived in the US, I spent most of my energy getting over
jet-lag and getting used to customs there.
Actually, I did not have time to spare because immediately my boss,
Professor Hoffman, told me “Let’s talk about your experimental schedule.” As soon as I organized all my things from
Japan, Professor Hoffman gave me my topic, “Study how to change mouse white
hair to black through gene and protein therapy of the hair follicle.” The project was part of a very hot topic at
AntiCancer, since my colleague at AntiCancer, Dr. Lingna Li, and Professor
Hoffman had just published the first paper on gene therapy of the hair follicle
in the new and already high-impact journal, Nature
Medicine. Newspapers, and magazines
picked up this story around the world and it even made headlines, and Professor
Hoffman appeared on the ABC Evening News anchored by Peter Jennings.
The
experimental method I initially tried was rather simple, using liposomes
containing melanin and applying them on mouse skin after shaving its white
hair. Restoring normal color to white
hair by this simple procedure would be a great discovery and create a sensation
in the cosmetic industry. However, all
the new hair that grew from the mouse skin was all white despite application
with the melanin liposomes. I repeated these
experiments for several months by changing the ratio of various lipids in the
liposomes; however, I could not get new black hair. I felt much pressure since I thought people in
the US value results above everything else.
Moreover, I did not want to be known as a Japanese guy who was
“good-for-nothing,” which would rapidly spread.
In addition, I thought my boss may have wanted me to go home.
One
day, Professor Hoffman brought me an issue of Science with a GFP-expressing C.
elegans round worm on the cover. Inside
was an article by Martin Chalfie on using the GFP gene to make the round worm
glow green by introducing the GFP gene.
He was also awarded the Nobel Prize for Chemistry for this work. The article reported that GFP was extracted from
Aequorea victoria and was identified
by Dr. Shimomura in 1962. Dr. Hoffman
jokingly asked “Is Dr. Shimomura Japanese?
Is this protein made in Japan?”
Moreover, Professor Hoffman said “Let’s stop the experiment using
melanin. Let’s start an experiment that
makes mouse hair fluoresce green using GFP.”
This was another difficult demand that seemed to me a joke again, but
Professor Hoffman was serious. This was the
moment when I learned about GFP for the first time. I thought, I could not deliver melanin into
the hair follicle and it would not be possible for me to introduce the GFP gene
into the hair follicle either. I
listened to Professor Hoffman with a feeling of resignation. However, an
idea then came to my mind, that GFP-labeled cancer cells could visualize the
process of cancer metastasis. AntiCancer had the best mouse models of cancer
metastasis in the world, and I thought my idea was a natural to do at
AntiCancer.
I
found a ray of hope in my study in the US which had come to a seemingly dead
end. Right away, I obtained the GFP gene
and a cancer cell line from the cell bank at AntiCancer. While I engaged in the project Professor
Hoffman suggested in the daytime, I was engaged in my experiment “to introduce
GFP-gene into cancer cells” far into the night, everyday. This was in the autumn in 1995.
Seize an Opportunity
However,
in spite of my expectation and much support from my co-workers at AntiCancer,
especially Dr. Yuying Tan, a very senior researcher, I could not succeed in
introducing the GFP gene into the cancer cells.
Experiment after experiment failed.
It was not clear whether my technique was wrong or the experimental
materials were insufficient. I worried
that I would be sent home. One day,
Professor Hoffman brought an issue of Science
to me. There was an article from a UCSD scientist
who developed a brighter GFP molecule.
At this moment, I thought this was what I was looking for. The scientist was Professor Roger Tsien, who
also won the 2008 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for GFP. I immediately wrote a letter to Professor Tsien
to share his newly modified GFP gene with me.
Two weeks later, the GFP gene arrived.
This was an epoch-making event for me.
I had further good fortune. Dr.
Yohei Miyagi of the Kanagawa Cancer Center, who taught me Introduction to Bioscience
in Yokohama came to San Diego and stayed one year at the Scripps Clinic for
research. I discussed my experiments with
Dr. Miyagi and found that there were some problems with the vector I used. He told me “I will help you before you leave
for Japan.” Immediately, I asked Dr.
Miyagi to construct a new vector for me.
After a short time, he handed me the new vector and joked, “You should
go home if you will not succeed with this vector.” I brought the vector to AntiCancer and made
up my mind to go home if I would fail. I
made a last-ditch effort in the next experiments. I carried out my work with the greatest
possible care.
Two
weeks later, when I looked at a flask taken out from a CO2-incubator
under a microscope, I shouted “My, my!” in spite of myself. They were bright green cells!! One year after I went to the US, I succeeded
in making cancer cells express GFP. In
the next moment I thought this was the steepest part of a path near the
mountaintop. In order to observe cancer
metastasis, I had to select cells expressing GFP and then inject the cells into
mice. In order to isolate a population
of pure GFP-expressing cells, I cultured hundreds of Petri dishes of cells. Day after day, I simply changed the culture
medium and transferred cells from dish to dish far into the night.
One
day, I found the temperature of the CO2-incubator was changed from
37°C
to a far higher temperature. All of my GFP-expressing
cells resulting from my super-hard work were completely destroyed. People around me saw me shouting “Who changed
the temperature?” At the time, I thought
it was done on purpose. Looking back, it
was most probably an accident, due to a cleaning person, who unknowingly
changed the temperature knob by accident.
“You
should try your experiments again and reproduce the results,” Dr. Miyagi told
me. After much effort, I succeeded in
isolating and establishing GFP-expressing cells about one month later. I was ready to observe GFP-expressing cells in vivo.
I injected GFP-expressing cells into the back of a nude mouse given to
me by my AntiCancer colleague. When I checked
the mouse one week after injection, a small tumor growing in the back of the
mouse could be observed. I wondered what
it looked like under excitation light.
Immediately, I saw the mouse under excitation light. Next moment, I shouted “Oh my! Is that true?” The tumor sparkled bright green. Moreover, the green fluorescence from the
cancer cells combined with the red color of the surrounding blood vessels to
produce an exquisite contrast. I
continued my experiment further with excitement raised from the depths of my
body. In addition, when I observed a
lung isolated from this mouse under the microscope, I saw an unbelievable scene
there. I could not find the appropriate
words, I shouted “Heavens” in spite of myself.
I could see many tiny metastases giving out vivid green color like the
stars in the night sky. I lost control of
myself until a colleague called out to me “Hi! Takashi.” I was standing absentmindedly in the dark
culture room. This was the moment when
GFP was imaged in vivo for the first
time, in this case used to see cancer micrometastasis for the first time in
live tissue.
Just
after this historical moment, I knocked on the door of Professor Hoffman’s room. He asked me “Takashi! What are you so excited about?” I told him, “Please come to the culture room,
immediately.” I guided my boss to the
culture room with my heart leaping for joy.
He looked into the microscope with trembling hands. He told me excitedly, “Takashi! This is an experiment that happens once in 10
years.” From that day, the possibility
to visualize tumor metastasis using GFP-expressing cancer cells began. It was in the summer of 1996.
Publishing Our
Results
However,
all things did not go well and many things remained to be solved because
everything was being done for the first time. For example, there were many apparatus needed
for the studies using GFP in vivo. We especially needed a fluorescence microscope
with a camera. In order to take pictures
of faintly shining cells, I had to wait until night and take pictures of
GFP-expressing cells using a conventional single-lens reflex camera.
Dr.
Hoffman told me the fact that more scientists got the Nobel Prize in the US than
in Japan may not depend on a language barrier but on the motivation of
scientists. I could not help changing my
thoughts. I started to think GFP work
could get the Nobel Prize someday. While
I was collecting my results using GFP-expressing cancer cells in mice, I simultaneously
started preparing manuscripts for scientific journals and for patent
applications. Professor Hoffman helped
me submit a paper to Nature Biotechnology. We did not receive an answer from the journal
after two months. Professor Hoffman then
asked the editorial office how the review was going. The editorial office only told him “It is
under review,” and we could not obtain a formal answer. After three months, the editorial office gave
us the official answer in which one of two reviewers gave positive comments, but
another reviewer gave very negative comments, that this article did not deserve
publication in this journal because there was nothing worthwhile.
I
remember that I was greatly disappointed with the answer, because I strongly
expected the manuscript would be accepted.
Professor Hoffman felt bitter about the rejection, saying “We were
cheated.” According to Professor Hoffman,
the reviewer who gave negative comments may have been a competitor. We worried that the reviewer’s group had begun
similar experiments. Therefore, Professor
Hoffman asked me to carry out new experiments as soon as possible. I understood later that the date of receipt
is very important in contributing an article to a scientific journal and in filing
patent applications. At that time, I
felt that Professor Hoffman was aiming for the Nobel Prize for the use of GFP in vivo.
Now, I realize Professor Hoffman is a modest man and I was projecting my
own fantasies on him. When we began to
write up our work, I told Professor Hoffman that I needed some papers in order to
get my Ph.D. Professor Hoffman then
worked with me for many weeks often staying up all night writing together. We submitted almost 10 papers during this
time. Our first results appeared in
Cancer Research 57, 2042-2047 (1997). It
was in the spring of 1997. This was the
first paper describing GFP imaging in vivo. This paper has now been cited more than 200
times. It was the first of many
OncoBrite papers published by the AntiCancer team on GFP imaging. AntiCancer is world famous for this work.
Real World
In
March of 1997, I returned to my country.
Professor Hoffman offered me a chance to stay on, but I thought my
future was to become a famous doctor in Japan.
My life during two years at AntiCancer gave me more than what I could
obtain from experiences over 10 years in Japan.
After returning home, many colleagues and mentors asked me about my life
in the US. They were equally surprised
and impressed with my great accomplishments.
However, when I told them I thought Professor Hoffman was aiming for the
Nobel Prize for GFP, they gave me a questioning look saying it must be
tough. Moreover, most of them said to me
partly for fun, “But if you can win the Nobel Prize, we will treat you to
dinner.” Only one friend seriously asked
me to tell the story in detail. I
reconfirmed the difference between the US and Japan with regard to motivation for
scientific research.
At
this point, I reached a turning-point in my life. Unfortunately, the value of my results in the
US was very low at my University. I was
given notice from the staff of the University at that time that they did not
need my results in the US. I was forced
to choose between continuing research in the US or training myself as a surgeon
at a general hospital in Japan. Then, I
reconsidered which dream was mine, “basic cancer research” or “clinical cancer
treatment.” When I remembered that I was
originally challenged to become a medical doctor prompted by grandmother’s
death due to cancer, to my surprise I could easily find a conclusion. I
reconfirmed that my dream was not “the forefront of basic cancer research” but
“the forefront of clinical cancer treatment.”
I decided to train myself as a clinical surgeon. Fortunately, the GFP-expressing cancer cells that
I left in the US started a new project called “OncoBrite,” as noted above.
On
the other hand, I could not completely give up basic research at heart. Over a period of three years, whenever I had a
holiday of more than 3 days, I went to the US to help the “OncoBrite” project. However, as the reputation of GFP in biology
became higher and higher, a lot of laboratories with GFP-expressing cells joined
in, and it became hard for me to find my position. Moreover, as GFP-expressing cancer
cells went to higher levels at AntiCancer, like whole-body imaging, invented by
my successor, Dr. Meng Yang, the “OncoBrite” project went far from me. It was in the spring of 2000.
Nobel Fantasies
One
day, my wife and I were standing at the Blue Hall located at the City Hall in
Stockholm. I told my wife, “The celebration dinner after the Nobel Award
Ceremony is held here every year. Don’t
you think this place is filled with a solemn atmosphere? I talked about my dream that we would go to
Stockholm some day with Professor Hoffman.” I spoke to my wife while looking up the
ceiling. She asked me, “Who took over
your study using GFP-expressing cancer cells?”
In that instant, the memory of my study abroad crossed my mind. I answered, “The project is going well, I
hear.” I jestingly talked to my wife,
“However, my dream to come to Stockholm for the Award Ceremony of Nobel Prize
seems to be an impossible dream.” Then,
we entered the Golden Room. It was in
the autumn of 2004.
Next to the Nobel
Prize
On
October 8, 2008, GFP finally won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry 2008. The morning after the day when the Nobel
Prize in Chemistry was announced, I had a phone call from a TV station. The TV news reporter said, “As you know Dr.
Shimomura won the Nobel Prize in Chemistry for the discovery of GFP. I heard that you succeeded in observing cancer
metastases using GFP-expressing cancer cells for the first time. I would like to hear this story from you.” I was fully booked on that day; however, the
reporter said, “Timing is the point for this kind of news story. I would like to see you today.” In response to his request, finally I agreed
with his offer.
In
announcing the Nobel Prize, the Nobel Assembly stated “With the aid of GFP,
researchers have developed ways to watch processes that were previously
invisible, such as the development of nerve cells in the brain or how cancer
cells spread.” The development of ways
to watch processes of how cancer cells spread was started with my project and
continued at AntiCancer by many great scientists.
I
was really surprised that the project I started was mentioned in the Nobel
Prize announcement. I became
increasingly excited. It was a strange
moment that I felt close to the Nobel Prize.
After
surgery in the morning, TV and news reporters waited for me. I explained my experiments using
GFP-expressing cells in the US with a variety of slides. When news reporters asked me to comment on
the Nobel Prize: “The most impressive point for me is the high motivation of
researchers in the US.” What I said was
a message for Japanese young researchers.
The
following morning a patient spoke to me after their medical examination, “I saw
the TV program where you appeared last night.
I was very surprised that my doctor is close to the Nobel Prize, because
I thought that the Nobel Prize is unrelated to me. The Nobel Prize is now not so far from me and
I can boast about you to my friends. It
is too bad you missed the Nobel Prize. However,
I am still alive thanks to your good diagnosis and skillful technique; I cannot
thank you enough. I would like to give
you our Nobel Prize.” Then, a small
child next to her gave me a “Thank you letter” and “Gold Medal” made of origami
(Japanese colored paper work). This was
the happiest moment that I had experienced during the past 12 years as a
clinical surgeon. I felt that this was
the Nobel Prize I have been looking for.
This took place on October 10, 2008, two days after the Nobel Prize
announcement. That day was my 44th
birthday by a curious coincidence.
Message to Young
Researchers
Dr.
Shimomura’s comments on his Nobel Prize Award were the following: “Young
scientists should be more confident about their own projects. Once you start an interesting project, you
should carry it out completely, overcoming every difficulty encountering
you.” What he said means “Always do your
best.” The Nobel Prize seems distant
from every researcher; however, it may be close to everybody if he would do his
best with confidence. If you would do
your best, even if you could not win the Nobel Prize, someone will give you “a special
gold medal.” If you have a chance, do
your best. Even if you could not reach
the goal after doing your best, you can accept the situation. But if you would fail without doing your
best, you would regret the results. We
can only have a few chances in life.